Skip to main content

Piracy and Stability


Shannon Hargitt
Global Security Studies
Professor Shirk
1 October 2017
Piracy and the Security of Somalia

Instability in the nation directly opens the door to illegal activity to gain basic personal and human security. Piracy is a direct effect of government instability in Somalia. Due to the instability in government and individual security, a rogue group of people decided to find another way to provide for their families and communities thus bringing a false sense of stability and security. Somali is a failed state, the government has collapsed and is mostly non-existent, and whatever government there is holds no real power to create change or help its people. Therefore, instability lead to the need for Somali pirates to begin raiding and holding ships for hostage to bring a profit back to their communities.
Piracy is an act in which people set up preplanned attacks on ships and cargo vessels to either rob them or hold them for ransom. The profits of which help to fund more attacks and create stability for those who participate in it. Piracy was a $12 billion industry in 2010, but has receded to exactly half of that to $6 billion in 2012.  Somali pirates first materialized as a risk to shipping companies and their crewmen since the second stage of the Somali Civil War in the early 21st century. Insecurity brought about by the Somalian Civil War have led to an eruption of piracy in international waters. Thus, affecting not only Somalian fishing companies and ships, but other national trade ships and businesses. Piracy emerged in the Gulf of Aden and caused economic backlash and safety concerns for both commercial and private businesses that use the Gulf of Aden as a necessary portion of their trade routes. While the piracy in the Gulf of Aden has been diminishing since its’ peak in 2006, it is continuously growing in the Strait of Malacca and the Gulf of Guinea.
            Regardless of where piracy is occurring in the world, the one variable that seems to be common is the instability of the government to protect or provide for its people. Piracy is a last resort type of action, meaning that if it had been avoidable I believe these men would not have resorted to it. The instability of the state of Somalia led to the act of piracy exploding in the Gulf of Aden and the waters surrounding Somalia. While Somalia is a failed state, there are other states that hold a candle of comparison with the same kinds of problems. For example, in Iraq the instability in the government allowed for the formation of Al Qaeda and then eventually ISIS. This instability and insecurity opened the door to people seeking illegal means to achieve their goals and to seek security.  Somalia is a failed state and does not supply the human security or even ontological security for their people, without the security of their people they resort to illegal means to find their fundamental security. This is exactly why when interviewing people of Somalia it was not unordinary for the pirates and their actions to be supported by the people. Some Somalian citizens even refer to the pirates as their personal navy of coast guard. This all comes from the fact that they provide a sense of monetary and physical security that their governments is incapable of. Ultimately these people are seeking protection, security, and stability and a life of piracy provides this for them as a more viable option than waiting to rely on a broken system of government.



Comments

  1. Nice analysis! I thought it was a great connection to mention how this cycle of instability is not a localized issue, and appears in different forms across the globe. It is unfortunate that the people of Somalia felt like their only option was to turn to piracy to basically survive. The question the keeps floating around in my mind is, with the conditions in the failed state of Somalia, did people have a better alternative than to turn to piracy? Without there being a governmental presence in this country to provide help and support for the people, they had to turn somewhere else for resources and money. It definitely is a complex and difficult issue.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I really liked your thesis, that instability caused people to turn to piracy as a last resort. This reminds me of one of the first classes that we had when we discussed the different types of security. Your example seems to emulate the ideas behind national security and the thought that the state is necessary for human flourishing. The absence of a stable state in Somalia has led to the rise of piracy in the country. However, at the same time, I wonder if the increase in piracy has prevented the creation of a new, stable government. Especially considering the fact that, as you pointed out, many Somali people view pirates as a sort of coast guard in lieu of any real government to protect them.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I liked the comparison to ISIS and the Middle East with the instability which is something I touched upon as well. I do want to say that does the piracy create security for the people within the region really? Since we discussed within class that the people who actually did the acts of piracy withhold most of the money and the people get very little. I would say they receive more of a cushion rather than security, even without thinking towards economic security it is hard to see that the people in Somalia are ontologically secure. Also I agree with Rachael and the fact that the government was cut short of being able grow to become more stable since the people have been put in a mind set that this is all they have now.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I really enjoyed your last paragraph as it summarizes the overall failure of Somalia to protect its nation's identity and the overall demise of ontological security. The concept of piracy being a last resort is an interesting idea that you explored very well. Essentially, the unstable governmental actions of Somalia combined with the attributes of it being a failed state contributes to people resulting to extreme measures as a means to an end. This I see is almost comparable to other types of extremism like with members of ISIS or other groups like Boko Haram. Doing an unjust, criminal, and dare to say immoral act is something most individuals do out of last resort effort; therefore, by saying that piracy is within those parameters and supported by other Somalians creates a bizarre sense of validity within the Somali minds.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Stability of Insecurity: China and North Korea

The supportive relationship China has with its neighboring country North Korea dates back to the Korean War. China’s political approach to supporting North Korea arose from the mindset of ‘the enemy of my enemy is my friend.’ During the Korean War, China fought in support of Communist North Korea in retaliation of the United States interfering in South Korea. While the US and China have an unspoken pact to try and keep peace, it is quite clear that the two super powers disagree far more than they agree. Ultimately, China supports North Korea merely because they do not want to suffer from the instability it might cause if the state were to collapse under its current regime. While the human and individual security in North Korea is at risk from all the humanitarian injustice it’s people are enduring, the national security of the state has been far more constant with this regime. The insecurity of its people is only one cost of maintaining stability of the nation. To the North Korean g...

Security Revision

Like most things in this world, opinions are bound to change with the times that they live in. Before this class, I put security to be for the common good, with the common good saying that the national security is over other types of security. After taking the class I would say my opinion is unmoved by what it started. The opinion I had on national security as the greater good since this is what keeps the world as we know it flowing is what I still stand by. The cases that support this stance would be the problems within Sierra Leone and also the problems with Tuvalu. Both have cases that can easily argue for the human security but I still stand towards the greater good over individuals.     In the instance of Sierra Leone, national security must be protected to ensure those within the nation are able to have human and ontological security. In this case, the national security would have been able to enforce borders so that the pillaging of the resources would not have occurre...

Implications of Religion within the Balkan Conflict

       In the 1990s, at the end of the Cold War when tensions in eastern Europe were easing and western Europe and the United States were enjoying a period of relative peace, the notion of ethnic cleansing or conflict of cultures was not prominent in the international community. After World War II, the international community set forth policies and law to ensure a genocide or unification of a single race would never plague any nation and that global diversity was a positive implication. However, the fall of the Soviet Union and the ending of the Cold War appeared to usher in a period of progressive ideas to promote stability in eastern Europe; however, ironically, the sudden independence of the former Soviet-controlled Balkan States led to a rise in nationalistic pride where religion was used as justification for war and ethnic cleansing.  The reunification of Germany and the fall of the Berlin Wall, both symbols of the fallout after World War I...