Skip to main content

North Korea Control

When thinking about North Korea many questions can be asked about its population and even its leaders but a major question that has yet to be fully understood is how does a regime control the whole country? The problem within the country is that the government has everything and the people get the scraps that the higher up people decide worthy to be thrown their way. This can be easily seen with the only electrical output that you can see from pictures from space is the capital of Pyongyang and everywhere else it is black with little spots here and there throughout the country. The whole country being in a state of an electrical blackout can be okay if the country itself is not doing that well in aspects of their economy and their own natural resources but this is coming from a country that is attempting to create nuclear weapons and clearly has the money to invest into this and continue their trade with China so the argument that North Korea has no choice but to let its people suffer is wrong. To put this into perspective better based on the data from OEC North Korea spent just under $50 million just importing sculptures and I think a majority of the people who see this happening know that this is not an effort to make the overall population have a better life.
                To the question about how the regime can control its citizens comes down to the point of how would it be possible to be so involved in their lives to the point where it is just the norm for the government to be associated with your daily life. This can be seen through the attempted movement of the citizens within the country since to leave the country they must obtain permission from the government and this even goes further to the point where the regime controls the movement within the country. The regime is also said to locate certain people to the poorer, less favorable parts of the country as punishment and even political persecution. It gets even worse when it comes to the point of freedom of speech and the media within the country. North Korea is regularly ranked near the bottom of the lists for freedom of speech and within a report from Freedom House it showed that the nation has “one of the most repressive media environments in the world”. Also, there is only a handful of high officials that even have access to internet and outside information. Living within the country seems to make it seem like there is no world outside the life that is offered to the citizens of the country. In a case though done by NGO it found that 35 out of 36 respondents who had enough freedom to just speak with them have said that they and their family make jokes about the regime. This might be a small case but there is not much information coming out of the very restricted country so even this information can help understand the citizens take on the regime itself.
                We might be viewing the country differently from what it actually is since we might be seeing only one side of the story. We always are able to see the big celebrations with parades and marches that North Korea puts on with its citizens waving their flag proudly for the camera and this is seen as the majority of the country is backing the regime that constantly treats the citizens like nothing. This going back to the security of the people within the country can be seen as its citizens being ontologically secure since they seem to be happy with what is their lives and this is what is sent out to the world through the repressive media, but the truth that is seen through some small studies has found that they people of the country can see that they are oppressed and do not view their lives to be valued by their government since if the spoke ill they could be sent to prison or even worse. This side seems to be the more likely story with the ontological security of its citizens being not at all in the sense secure. They might be in a state of constant with them just getting by but imagine living in a place where one slip up and you could be sent to prison for expressing your views that differ from your government.

https://atlas.media.mit.edu/en/profile/country/prk/
https://www.libertyinnorthkorea.org/learn-nk-challenges/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/what-do-north-koreans-think-about-kim-jong-un-this-survey-tries-to-find-out/2016/11/01/2a2cc357-34a9-464c-b32f-1291d16dd1b0_story.html?utm_term=.d75714fed3e1

Comments

  1. AnonymousOctober 31, 2017 at 9:21 AM

    I like your implication and analysis of ontological security within the individual lives of every person living in North Korea. Within media especially, there is a notion that North Korea has brainwashed its people into robotic beings subjected under oppression with no reform or retaliation. While this is seemingly true for the mere fact fear is a major implication, people recognize their confinement to the country and understand the humanitarian crisis at hand. The options for escape are limited, however. Help of the international community is a necessity in order to provide a path to freedom. Either by democratic reform of eliminating elitist powers or through foreign aid and intervention all is necessary. North Korea can not continue their violations and can not set precedent for other elitist powers.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Revisiting my Security Essay

Entering this class with no previous political science experience, I had an extremely open mind about security. In my security essay, I argued that human security should be prioritized above all other types of security; using history to prove my point. I am advocating for this view of security because I see how in history and in modernity, a lack of human security can directly result in the eventual collapse of a system of rule. Two sources covered in this class which illuminate the importance of human security are Pervenia Brown’s Worldpress article “Blood Diamonds” and Christian Bueger’s article “Practice, Pirate and Coast Guards: the grand narrative of Somali piracy”. Both of these works focus on the importance of human security through examining Sierra Leone’s diamond operation and the rationale behind Somali piracy. Aside from the two sources I chose for this discussion, I believe that most if not all of the cases we examined for this class involve aspects of human security at th...
1 comment
Read more

The problem IS in our own backyard

When thinking about the global issue of sex trafficking, many Americans believe that the issue is not pertinent to American politics, and therefore dismiss the issue on the grounds of irrelevance. However, sex trafficking is actually a major problem in the US, with an estimated 100,000-300,000 american children affected by sex trafficking a year, not including immigrants that were brought into the U.S., or exploited upon entering the U.S.. Sex trafficking is a huge infringement on a person’s human rights, and is a major problem in the US as well as the rest of the world. It should not be ignored by the American populace, but must be addressed at home instead of just being considered ‘their problem and not ours.’             Many people associate problems with underdeveloped countries as exacerbating the sex trafficking trade, believing that sex trafficking is something that only occurs in countries in Africa, Asia, and South Amer...
3 comments
Read more

Security Essay Revision

In my security essay I argued that national security should remain the definition of security and not be modified to include human rights and environmental issues. Instead of expanding the definition of security to contain these issues, I argued that those issues should be simply elevated in standing and viewed as just as or more important than national security by governments and citizens alike. After taking this class, I am now arguing that security should move away from national security to focus more on global security, and that human rights should be included in the definition of global security. However, the global community should never completely override the sovereignty of the state in which it is working, but should include that state in all decisions. I am changing my argument after learning about the Sierra Leone blood diamond conflict and the after effects of the earthquake that destroyed Haiti in 2010. Both countries were unable, by themselves, to effectively deal with t...
1 comment
Read more